|
Nina Beier and Marie Lund Represented by: Laura Bartlett Gallery, London ----------------------------------------------------------- News: Current and upcoming group exhibitions include: -'Momentum Nordic Biennial', curated by Lina Dzuverovic and Stina Högkvist, Moss, Aug – Sep -'La Notte', curated by Lorenzo Benedetti, Kunsthalle Mulhouse, March-June -'Getting Even -Oppositions + Dialogues', curated by Matt Packer, Kunstverein Hannover, June-July -'Reduction & Suspense ', curated by Eva Kraus and Tilo Schulz, Kunstverein Bregenz, July-Aug -'Revolver', curated by Severin Dünser and Christian Kobald, COCO Kunstverein, Vienna, May-June -'A Sensed Pertubation', Murray Guy, New York, June-July -'We would like to thank (again) the curators who wish to remain anonymous', Anne Barrault, Paris, June - July ‘Chapter Three: The Wall of the Sky, The Wall of the Eye’, curated by Christiane Rekade, About Change Collection, Berlin, May-July
----------------------------------------------------------- About Berlin and London-based Danish artists Nina Beier and Marie Lund work collaboratively as well as individually within their practise. Autobiography (if these walls could speak) operates on a site-specific level, and it literally frames the exhibition: The artists asked the gallerists to recall all the holes made from the nails and screws used to hang artworks on the walls since the gallery had opened. These holes have been carefully excavated and reopened, and the small piles of dust generated in the process have been left on the floor—meticulously unveiling what had been just as meticulously hidden. It is a generally accepted premise that each gallery exhibition leaves no traces, and the space serves as a blank page for the subsequent show. Similarly, it is taken for granted that the viewer is able to blank out whatever was shown previously. By disrupting this relationship Beier and Lund point towards the constructed situation, not only of the physical space but also of the continuous exhibition program that constitutes a gallery—especially one with a relatively short history such as Croy Nielsen. As often the case in their work, a simple instruction leads to an action that in turn leaves behind certain traces. Not just the traces are important; equally significant are the individuals performing the instruction and their experience of the situation (on another occasion they asked a gallery attendant to let his hair and beard grow during the show, for example). In this case, the “performers” are the gallerists, who also mediate and discuss the work with visitors. This means that their subjective experience forms a crucial part of the work. The holes convey the ghostly presence of past exhibitions, and the work forms a kind of ritual within which these are able co-exist—at least until the exhibition by Beier and Lund comes to an end and the whole process is repeated in reverse. Inverse repetition is also an element in the series (Calling) Loss and Cause, which consists of unfired clay replicas of sculptures that have disappeared from collections around the world at different points in history. They have been modeled on the plinths upon which they are exhibited—fully showing the marks of their making process. Placed in a dense grouping, they convey the sense of a studio or storage space rather than a presentation. At the beginning of the exhibition the sculptures are wet and soft and become brittle and fragile as they gradually dry. The potential owner must assume responsibility for taking care of them, but he or she must potentially sacrifice them for the greater good of our cultural heritage: If the original sculpture should resurface, the owner is obliged to destroy the replica. The sculptures function as stand-ins of a sort, which communicate their temporary nature both in terms of their material and imperfect aesthetic. They exist because the originals have disappeared, and they will disappear themselves should this situation change. Some of the stories behind the individual sculptures, which have been stolen or simply lost in bureaucracy, are related to specific political or historical events, but their hand-made aesthetic suggests the notion of a much more short-lived process—and the fact that even within the act of making lies the desire that the work of art be preserved for the future. The work emphasizes certain aspects of cultural heritage and property while challenging the importance of universal value as opposed to private property. New Novels, New Men (Jealousy, Jalousi, La Celosia, La Gelosia, Die Jalousie oder Die Eifersucht) is the title of an event that takes place throughout the entire period of the exhibition: It includes five different translations of Alain Robbe-Grillet’s La Jalousie and five young men, native speakers of each respective language, who come by to read the books for periods of time. Bookmarks mark their place until they have completed their individual copies. The viewer will not necessarily encounter one of the readers (who each decide when they will come), but the bookmarks mark the fact that someone is reading the book and thus function as stand-ins—in a manner similar to the holes in the walls or the sculptures of (Calling) Loss and Cause. In French La Jalousie carries both the meaning of jealousy and Venetian blinds (through which the narrator spies on his wife). This double meaning is either lost or handled in alternative ways in the translations. Robbe-Grillet’s work bucks traditional literary conventions and La Jalousie contains almost no action. The narrator is a recording eye, detached in tone but obsessively involved with the objects and events related to his wife’s infidelity. Visitors to the exhibition are left to observe the readers, witnessing the inaccessible experience that is taking place in front of them. Beier and Lund add their own layer onto the narrative style of Robbe-Grillet—leaving the viewer on the outside to rely on his or her own interpretation. A perceptual triangle is formed: the intention of the writer, the experience of the reader, and the viewer’s limited observation of this exchange. The work deals with the distance between a private experience such as reading, on one hand, and collective experience such as the translation or distribution of a book, on the other—a process that unavoidably leads to certain alterations or even misunderstandings. The final work in Beier and Lund’s exhibition is presented on the shelves of the gallery’s office, and it also deals with issues of perception, language, and translation. The Points is a series of abstract shapes cut out of the covers of theoretical books in different languages and from various disciplines (psychology, economics, politics, social theory, etc.). They are mounted on pieces of cardboard that are the same size as the respective original books. Furthermore, each work bears the often complex title of the book, such as El Concepto de Correccion y Prestigio Linguisticos or Fundamentals of Learning and Motivation. Together (the presentation at Croy Nielsen includes 37 pieces) they create a sort of map of different theoretical convictions. Detached from their content both the titles (language) and imagery seem like arbitrary attempts to capture the full content of the book in short and simple form. Visually The Points celebrate a certain design favored when trying to illustrate abstract thought. Isolated from the rest of the cover, the clear colors and geometric shapes inevitably refer to the history of abstract painting, and in particular that of the avant-garde. Presented on the shelves normally housing the gallery’s library, this art-historical source is turned on its head and reappears as the graphic design of the book covers. This is taken another step further by printing some of the works in this publication. The four works that make up Permanent Collection deal with various time spans, and they all involve subtle alterations or even obstructions through which Beier and Lund underscore systems of representations that are part of our cultural heritage and visual culture. By using the frame of the exhibition (the history of the gallery and its space, the presence of the gallerists as mediators), the time span of the exhibition (during which the readers have to finish their respective copies of La Jalousie), the premises of collecting, and the pre-existing language of graphic design, Beier and Lund gently push given conceptual structures towards a breakdown or negation of their presumable logic.’ .
|
|
|
|||
|
The WitnessA gallery attendant has been asked to let his hair (and beard)
Event, ICA, May-Nov, 2008
|